A feud has recently erupted between Clint Eastwood and Spike Lee over Eastwood not featuring any black soldiers in his World War II epic films, Letters from Iwo Jima and Flags of our Fathers.Two great directors, many great films, so few brain cells.
First blood was drawn by Lee, director of several ground-breaking films, including one of my favorite movies of all time, Mo' Better Blues, when Lee said during an interview at Cannes, "He did two films about Iwo Jima back to back and there was not one black soldier in both of those films."
Clint, retorted poetically, "A guy like him should shut his face."I am not sure what he meant by, "A guy like him," but geez, down Clint, down.
In his defense, Clint went on to add that while there was a small detachment of black troops on Iwo Jima as a part of a munitions company, "they didn't raise the flag. The story is 'Flags of Our Fathers,' the famous flag-raising picture, and they didn't do that. If I go ahead and put an African-American actor in there, people'd go, 'This guy's lost his mind.' I mean, it's not accurate."
Unmentioned by Clint is the fact that Letters from Iwo Jima was from the Japanese perspective of the battle. I could be mistaken about blacks fighting for the Japanese but, oh... never mind.
Spike, not to be outdone, or let truth get in the way, responded, "I know the history of Hollywood and its omission of the one million African-American men and women who contributed to World War II. Not everything was John Wayne, baby."Stay on topic now, Spike.
While the both of them are acting (of the other kind) like children, I have to side with Clint on this one. By Spike's logic, movies such as Titanic, which surely was a ship with black people on it, should have had a scene showing the guys working on the boat. Why isn't spike criticizing that cinematic error? And why criticize the Iwo Jima films several years after the fact?
When it comes to controversy, Spike's gotta have it. Especially since he is promoting his new film, Miracle at St. Anna.
Clint could have reacted a bit less harsh for a sagely man of his years. But, perhaps reminiscing on the old Dirty Harry days, he felt he had strike to back with sudden impact.
Two grown men with a fist full of dollars should do the right thing, any which way they can instead of throwing the gauntlet down.
This weeks "Rude or Stupid" winners will receive pirated downloads of the audio-book The Greatest Generation, byTom Brokaw's as well as Dale Carnegie's classic, How to Win Friends and Influence People.
...















4 Comments:
Clint is the man! I agree that the Spike lee is being both rude and stupid. The way I figure it. Spike Lee is out there to balance the misrepresentation of Black contribution to the world. Honestly, its just a film, so what if it isn't afro-centric. Does anyone pipe up when Lee misrepresents others? I have never heard anything
Furthermore, I get really tired when young directors/producers seem to ride the fast train to success these days. Not realizing that guys like Clint have been in the game forever and a day. that they dug in during the start of the big screen, paving the way for all the young cinema genius to have an easier time of things anyway.
Take a chill pill Spike!
yeah, with that movie about english teachers in south korea coming out later this year in the states ('Expats') i can only hope there are plenty of black people in it...SO MANY black people in south korea teaching english...
;)
Spike Lee is being a moron. He's just trying to plug his new film. If you look at his own filmography, how many white people have been showcased in films such as Malcolm X, Jungle Fever, or Do the Right Thing? What a hypocrite.
Just think of Spike's reaction when this fine honky of a writer publishes his memoirs of his high school daze. Dating black girls will either offend the hell outta him or he'd do a sequel to Jungle Fever. Maybe Clint could be the racist grandfatherly figure...
Post a Comment